The British actor Rowan Atkinson — better known to many of his fans as “Mr. Bean” — gave a much-noted speech a few days ago on behalf of the “Reform Section 5” campaign, which aims to overturn the provisions of British law that allow people to be criminally prosecuted if their words cause insult (or might cause insult) to someone.
Anticipating the need for translated and subtitled versions of the speech, Vlad Tepes has transcribed it, and used the transcript to subtitle Mr. Atkinson’s words in English:
If I’m not mistaken, a German translation is in the works.
Transcript:
| 00:08 | My starting point, when it comes to the… | |
| 00:13 | consideration of any issue relating to free speech, is my passionate belief that the second most… | |
| 00:18 | precious thing in life is the right to express yourself | |
| 00:22 | freely. The most precious thing in life I think, is, food in your mouth | |
| 00:26 | and the third most precious is a roof over your head. | |
| 00:30 | But a fixture for me in the number 2 slot is… | |
| 00:34 | free expression just below the need to sustain life itself. | |
| 00:38 | That is because I have enjoyed free expression in this | |
| 00:42 | country all my professional life and fully expect to | |
| 00:46 | continue to do so. Personally I suspect I am highly unlikely | |
| 00:50 | to be arrested for whatever laws exist to contain free expression… | |
| 00:55 | because of the undoubtedly privileged position that is afforded to those… | |
| 00:59 | of a high public profile. So my concerns are less | |
| 01:03 | for myself, and more for those more vulnerable | |
| 01:07 | because of their lower profile. Like the man arrested in | |
| 01:11 | Oxford for calling a police horse ‘gay’. Or | |
| 01:15 | the teenager for calling the Church of Scientology… | |
| 01:19 | a ‘cult’. Or the cafe owner arrested for | |
| 01:24 | displaying passages from the Bible on a TV screen. | |
| 01:28 | When I heard of some of these more ludicrous offences and | |
| 01:32 | charges I remember that I had been here before in a | |
| 01:36 | fictional context. I once did a show called, ‘Not the Nine O’clock | |
| 01:40 | News’ some years ago, and we did a sketch where Griff Rhys Jones | |
| 01:44 | played Constable Savage. A manifestly | |
| 01:48 | racist police officer to whom as I as his station… | |
| 01:52 | commander is giving a dressing down for arresting a black man on a | |
| 01:57 | whole string of ridiculous, trumped up and ludicrous charges. | |
| 02:01 | The charges for which Constable Savage arrested Mr. Winston Kodogo | |
| 02:05 | of 55 Mercer Rd. were these: Walking on the | |
| 02:09 | cracks in the pavement. Walking | |
| 02:13 | in a loud shirt in a built up area during the hours of darkness. | |
| 02:17 | And one of my favourites, walking around all… | |
| 02:21 | over the place. He was also arrested for | |
| 02:26 | urinating in a public convenience, and looking | |
| 02:30 | at me in a funny way. Who would have thought | |
| 02:34 | that we would end up with a law that would allow life to imitate art | |
| 02:38 | so exactly? I read somewhere a defender of | |
| 02:42 | the status quo claiming that the fact that the gay horse case was dropped, | |
| 02:46 | after the arrested man refused to pay the fine | |
| 02:50 | and that the Scientology case was also dropped at some point during the | |
| 02:54 | court process was proof that the law was working well. | |
| 02:58 | Ignoring the fact that the only reason these cases were dropped was | |
| 03:03 | because of the publicity that they had attracted. The police… | |
| 03:07 | sensed that ridicule was just around the corner, and withdrew | |
| 03:11 | their action. But what about the thousands of other cases | |
| 03:15 | that did not enjoy the oxygen of publicity? | |
| 03:19 | That weren’t quite ludicrous enough to attract media | |
| 03:23 | attention? Even for those actions that were withdrawn, people were | |
| 03:27 | arrested, questioned, taken to court, and then released. | |
| 03:31 | That isn’t the law working properly. That is censoriousness | |
| 03:35 | of the most intimidating kind, guaranteed to have | |
| 03:39 | as Lord Dear says, the “chilling effect on free expression and free… | |
| 03:43 | protest”. Parliament’s Joint Committee on Human Rights | |
| 03:48 | summarized, as you may know, this whole issue very well by saying… | |
| 03:52 | “while arresting a protester for using threatening or abusive… | |
| 03:56 | speech may, depending on the circumstances, be a proportionate… | |
| 04:00 | response, we do not think that language or behaviour that is merely… | |
| 04:04 | insulting should ever be criminalized in this way.” | |
| 04:08 | The clear problem with the outlawing of insult | |
| 04:12 | is that too many things can be interpreted as such | |
| 04:16 | Criticism is easily construed as insult by certain parties. | |
| 04:20 | ridicule easily construed as insult. Sarcasm, unfavourable… | |
| 04:25 | comparison, merely stating an alternative point of view | |
| 04:29 | to the orthodoxy can be interpreted as insult | |
| 04:33 | and because so many things can be interpreted as insult it is hardly surprising | |
| 04:37 | that so many things have been, as the examples I talked about earlier.. | |
| 04:41 | show. Although the law under discussion has been on the statute… | |
| 04:45 | book for over 25 years, it is indicative of a culture… | |
| 04:49 | that has taken hold of the programmes of successive governments… | |
| 04:54 | that with a reasonable and well intentioned ambition | |
| 04:58 | to contain obnoxious elements in society has created | |
| 05:02 | a society of an extraordinarily authoritarian and controlling | |
| 05:06 | nature. It is what you might call, ‘the new intolerance’ | |
| 05:10 | a new but intense desire to gag … | |
| 05:14 | uncomfortable voices of dissent. “I am not intolerant”… | |
| 05:18 | say many people. Say many softly spoken highly educated | |
| 05:22 | liberal minded people. “I am only intolerant of intolerance.” | |
| 05:26 | ..and people tend to nod sagely and say “oh yes wise words” | |
| 05:30 | and yet if you think about this inarguable statement | |
| 05:34 | for longer than 5 seconds you realize that all it is advocating is a replacement | |
| 05:38 | of 1 kind of intolerance with another. Which to me doesn’t | |
| 05:43 | represent any kind of progress at all. Underlying… | |
| 05:47 | prejudices injustices or resentments are not addressed… | |
| 05:51 | by arresting people. They are addressed by the issues being aired, | |
| 05:55 | argued and dealt with preferably outside the legal | |
| 05:59 | process. For me, the best way to increase … | |
| 06:03 | society’s resistance to insulting or offensive speech, | |
| 06:07 | is to allow a lot more of it. | |
| 06:12 | As with childhood diseases you can better resist those germs to which you have been | |
| 06:16 | exposed. We need to build our immunity to | |
| 06:20 | taking offence, so that we can deal with the issues that perfectly… | |
| 06:24 | justified criticism can raise. Our priorities should be | |
| 06:28 | to be to deal with the message, not the messenger. As President Obama | |
| 06:32 | said, in an address to the UN only a month or so ago… | |
| 06:36 | “Laudable efforts to restrict speech can become… | |
| 06:40 | a tool to silence critics or oppress minorities.” | |
| 06:44 | The strongest weapon against hateful speech, is not | |
| 06:48 | repression, it is more speech. | |
| 06:52 | And that’s the essence of my thesis, more speech. | |
| 06:57 | If we want a robust society we need more robust dialogue | |
| 07:01 | and that must include the right to insult or to offend. | |
| 07:05 | And as, even if, as Lord Dear says, | |
| 07:09 | “you know the freedom to be inoffensive is no freedom at all” | |
| 07:13 | The repeal of this word in this clause will be only | |
| 07:17 | a small step but it will, I hope, be a critical one in what should be a longer term | |
| 07:21 | project to pause and slowly rewind | |
| 07:25 | the creeping culture of censoriousness. | |
| 07:29 | It is a small skirmish in the battle, in my opinion, to deal | |
| 07:33 | with what Sir Salman Rushdie refers to as, ‘The outrage industry’. | |
| 07:38 | Self-appointed arbiters of the public good… | |
| 07:42 | encouraging media stoked outrage to which the police feel under terrible | |
| 07:46 | pressure to react. A newspaper rings up Scotland Yard: | |
| 07:50 | someone has said something slightly insulting on Twitter | |
| 07:54 | about someone who we think, a national treasure. | |
| 07:58 | What are you going to do about it? The police panic and | |
| 08:02 | and they scramble around and then grasp the most inappropriate lifeline of all… | |
| 08:07 | Section 5 of the Public Order Act, that thing were you can arrest anybody… | |
| 08:11 | for saying anything that might be construed by anyone else as insulting. | |
| 08:15 | You know they don’t seem to need a real victim; they need only to make the judgment that somebody could have… | |
| 08:19 | been offended if they had heard or read what has been said, the most | |
| 08:23 | ludicrous degree of latitude. The | |
| 08:27 | storms that surround Twitter and Facebook comments have raised some fascinating | |
| 08:31 | issues about free speech which we haven’t really yet come to terms with: | |
| 08:35 | firstly, that we all have to take responsibility | |
| 08:40 | for what we say. Which is quite a good message to learn, | |
| 08:44 | but secondly we have learned how appallingly prickly | |
| 08:48 | and intolerant society has become over even the mildest | |
| 08:52 | adverse comment. The law should not be aiding | |
| 08:56 | and abetting this new intolerance. Free speech | |
| 09:00 | can only suffer if the law prevents us from dealing with its consequences | |
| 09:04 | I offer my whole-hearted support to the “Reform | |
| 09:08 | Section 5 Campaign”. |
0 comments:
Post a Comment